Study on Gender in Physics
ANNOUNCER: Section 3. You will hear two psychology students, Lisa and Greg, discussing a project they have to do. First, you have some time to look at questions 21 to 27. Now listen carefully and answer questions 21 to 27.
LISA: OK Greg, I finally managed to read the article you mentioned — the one about the study on gender in physics.
GREG: The study of college students carried out by Akira Miyake and his team? Yes, I found it interesting that the researchers were a mix of psychologists and physicists. That’s quite unusual.
LISA: Yes. At first I was confused about the students in the study. They weren’t actually physics majors. They were studying what are called STEM subjects — science, technology, engineering, and...
GREG: ...and mathematics. Yes, but they all had to take physics courses as part of their degree.
LISA: Right. The researchers started with the fact that women are underrepresented in introductory physics classes at college. On average, the women who enroll also perform worse than me
.
GREG: And the researchers wanted to discover why this happens and how they could improve the women’s results.
LISA: As I understood it, many female students believed that male students thought women were not good at physics. They assumed the men expected them to get low test scores.
GREG: Yes, and because they believed that, they became nervous and actually performed worse. But in reality, the male students were not making those assumptions.
LISA: The researchers then introduced a simple activity before class — a writing exercise. What was it called again?
GREG: It was called values affirmatio
.
LISA: Right. Students wrote an essay about important personal values, like music, family, or people who mattered to them.
GREG: The purpose was to encourage positive thinking. Writing about meaningful things can reduce psychological pressure and help students perform better.
LISA: What surprised the researchers was that this simple activity improved the women’s grades from around a C grade to about a B grade.
GREG: Yes, that’s a huge improvement. It suggests the women were underperforming before.
LISA: However, the article didn’t explain everything. For example, we don’t know whether the students wrote the essays once or several times, or whether they knew why they were writing.
GREG: Exactly. If the students knew the exercise was meant to help them improve, they might have simply tried to meet the researchers’ expectations.
ANNOUNCER: Before you hear the rest of the discussion, you have some time to look at questions 28 to 30. Now listen and answer questions 28 to 30.
GREG: For our project, we could run a similar experiment to see if the writing task was really responsible for the improvement.
LISA: Maybe we could ask some students to write about a general knowledge topic instead.
GREG: Or we could divide them into two groups: one group does a writing task, and the other does an oral task.
LISA: Another option is to have one group do the same writing task as the original study, and the other group write about something factual. Then we could compare the results.
GREG: Good idea. At our meeting with the supervisor on Monday, we should explain our research aims.
LISA: We should also read the original research paper, because the article we saw was only a summary.
LISA: I also read another article by Smolinsky about how men and women perform in mixed teams, single-sex teams, or when working individually.
GREG: Let me guess — women were better at teamwork?
LISA: Actually no. Both men and women achieved similar results, regardless of whether they worked alone or in teams.
GREG: My concern is whether we have enough time to complete everything.
LISA: We should be fine now that we know our plan. The only issue is deciding how to measure improvement in the students.
GREG: Yes, we may need advice on that. We also need to ensure we have the right sample size.
LISA: The next step could be checking the science class timetable, or perhaps making an appointment with a science professor.
GREG: That sounds like the best idea.
ANNOUNCER: That is the end of Section 3. You now have half a minute to check your answers.